Thursday, July 23, 2009

Writer's Block


Imagine the scene. Hip youngsters, well-read and literate all, lounging in a diner or cafe and discussing, over steamingly exquisite coffee, the pain of their writer's block. How their prose is stunted, their characters mute, the well of their inspiration dry and dusty. Sophisticated music plays in the background, providing a mellow undertone to their sophisticated, tragic discourse. Thelonius Monk, maybe, or Annie Lennox. M. C. Hammer, perhaps.


"Finally I have the time to write, and now my muse has left me!" they wail, and take another sip of espresso. Adjust their turtleneck. Sweep back their shoulder-length hair, and clean their trendy ebonny-rimmed glasses. "I hope this writer's block passes soon."


Mockery, to be sure, but let me be clear: writer's block is no myth, any more than impotence or claustrophobia. It can be the consequence of psychological stress and cause further stress on its own, it can have serious repercussions for one's personal pride and self-image, a vicious spiral of disappointment and despair.


Thankfully, in reality, it's surprisingly rare. The vast majority of cases of writer's block can actually be classified as a heady melange of laziness and trepidation, or perhaps intimidation. And that's a really happy fact, because there's an easy solution to it.


You ready?


 


<!--more-->




SHUT UP AND WRITE.




Yeah, you probaly saw that coming. But before you complain that that's no help at all and doesn't get to the root of the problem, keep in mind that, unlike impotence or claustrophobia, only very, very few people actually suffer from real, honest writer's block. Most people who self-diagnose it actually suffer from mundane afflictions related to fear and lethargy -- and more importantly, those who do sincerely suffer from the condition may actually benefit from assuming that they don't.


As I said in part 1, I know how it is - how humiliating and discouraging it is to feel that the story just isn't gelling, that your ideas aren't beign properly expressed, that your characters don't come out as vibrantly as you imagine them and that you just can't for the life of you figure out how to resolve the plot corners you've painted your characters into.


That's not writer's block. It's justthe wind and the rain.



Sure, it's nicer to go out and do your shopping when the sun's shining, but that's no reason to cloister yourself away indoors just because the sky is grey and the road's a little wet. It's not unsafe to drive, you won't freeze or dissolve, and you're out of Mountain Dew and toilet paper so slip into your wellies, strap on a southwester and go to the shops, there's a good lad.


If the prose isn't flowing like it should, then that's just too bad. Can't be sunny all the time, and there isn't a magic spell you can cast to fix it. You won't get through that by Not Writing, that's for sure.


You have a story on the brain that's been percolating there for a dog's age, you can taste its heady aroma, your mouth waters at its delights, but when you try to put the words down they're dull and plain and lack the lustre and sparkle you see in your mind's eye. It's that succulent meal that you want to deliver, not the drab gruel you see yourself writing, and it's very tempting to consider it (or yourself) a failure and head to the nearest café to drown your sorrows in caffeine-rich, hot black nectar.


Tough bones. Suck it up, and power on.


You'll get your mojo back eventually, and you'll get it back a damn sight faster if you write your way through the downturn. You can always go back and fix (or outright replace) the less-than-stellar portions you wrote. When you've completed the story you have to go back and do an edit pass anyway!


You don't even have to continue the story you find yourself blocked on. Everybody needs a break sometimes, and for a Writer there is no better way to take a break from writing one story than to write another one. Pick something simpler, something spontaneous and small and fun, perhaps far outside your usual sphere of interest.


Don't write for your audience or your own ambition. Odds are that's what got you tangled up in the first place, so give yourself some breathing room and just write a neat little story that satisfies all your secret little desires. Go ahead, you don't have to tell anyone.


Like the weather, Writer's Block will pass in its own time, sooner or later. You might as well get some Writing done while you're waiting, no?



Coming up in part 3: time management.


Tuesday, July 21, 2009

The Not Writer


I'm a writer, and I'm fairly proud of that. I take the craft seriously (most of the time), I've worked to hone my skills, I've studied. Much to learn, still, but that only makes it more fun. Many of my friends are writers too, and I know many writers who aren't friends but still awesome, and I take great delight in seeing people practicing the craft of storytelling with ever greater passion and sophistication.




When I'm asked for writing advice, however, I stop being an enthusiast and become a brutal drill sergeant. From my nostrils spews a venemous vapour called 'pessimism' and my eyes shoot lasers called 'terror'.




"Writing," I always say, "is a sordid beast that feeds on your pride and vomits only exhaustion and self-loathing. Writing," I always add, "leads to anger. Anger leads to hate, and hate..."






Well, you get the idea. I don't talk about 'finding one's voice' or 'research' or 'style'. These are important topics for writers, to say the least, but they're far more personal topics; many writers can solve them on their own and any individual piece of advice offers no guarantee of actually fitting a particular writer's sensibilities. There are of course some stand-bys that never miss their mark: "Read Strunk & White once every six months," or "Let your manuscript 'cool down' for at least three weeks after you finish it, before returning to edit," that sort of thing.




But that's advice for writers, and most people who ask me for advice are not writers. Read that sentence correctly, now: I don't mean that they aren't writers, I mean to say that they're Not Writers.<!--more-->


This isn't a disparagement, now. I don't by any means look down on Not Writers or dismiss them out of hand. Not Writers can sometimes write very well, paradoxically, and often study hard, being very eager to learn.




The difference between a Not Writer and a Writer is the difference between someone who could write and someone who does. A Not Writer is someone who experiences blocks and obstacles and timing issues and lets them prevent him or her from actually writing. A Not Writer may certainly be creative, insightful and capable of writing lyrical prose, but most of the time they're too busy Not Writing to get any Writing done. That's such a shame, such a waste, and that's the reason I so often deploy Tough Love upon those who ask for advice.


"My studies are really intense this semester, I can't focus on anything else right now," says the Not Writer. "I just can't seem to find any inspiration," he says, or "It just isn't gelling for me, I don't understand it."


The Not Writer enjoys conversing with other writers (many of whom, themselves, are Not Writers), seeks insights and techniques and delights in sharing stories of the writing experience and often clearly has an affinity for the craft, but at the end of the day he's spending all his scant free time Not Writing, and Drill Sergeant Alex Fucking Vance holds no truck with that bullshit.






Not to say I haven't been guilty of it myself, or even that I've outgrown it, though I'm twice as hard on myself as I am on others. I've often caught myself Not Writing and, some self-flagellation later, set myself straight. There are times when the words just flow, when the emotions and plot twists and characters spark from my fingers to the keyboard, and when that doesn't happen it feels unsatisfying and frustrating and humiliating. But a Writer mustn't put up with that nonsense.




In what will hopefully be a short series of posts, I'll try to highlight the most common reasons that keep creative, insightful people mired in Not Writerhood, and share my perspectives and solutions, all for the betterment of mankind.


Stay tuned.


- Alex F. Vance

Friday, July 3, 2009

HC2 Day - Spot the artists and take photos, people

Today's the day, vainglorious bastards.


Hundreds of copies of Heathen City Vol. 2 "Paved With Bad Intentions" are on their way to Pittsburgh for release at Anthrocon via treacherous and circuitous routes. The brave boys of FurPlanet charge through the wilderness of the Mexican/Canadian Neutral Zone toward the Pit of Burghs or whatever. Since the Powers That Be insist on once again holding this convention thousands of miles away from my slippers, I can't attend.


Hark, ye: the silver-bell tinkling sound of a writer's breaking heart!


You can help, though. That is, if you're going to Anthrocon and are a proud Heathen Citizen.


First of all, battle your way through the unwashed throngs to claim your copy. Then seek medical attention. Once your injuries are healed and your strength restored, do please share whatever observations or photographs you may have recorded - those of us who can't attend are simply DYING to hear from y'all. Obviously you can reply to this here mail, or you can tag a Tweet with #heathencity, or you can blog about it and you can be damn sure my army of Heathen City Cyber Samurai will track it down and bring it to my attention.


Did you get the HC logo tattooed on your right butt-cheek in a bid to get an even bigger discount from FurPlanet? Were you successful? Did you get Fel to sign your old, stained and sticky copy of HC #1? Do you have a phtograph of yourself looking wistfully past the enormous lines, sighing as you regard Krahnos' handsome visage from afar, or thrill to the sound of Vahnfox's voice?


Inquiring minds want to know.


Nay.


DEMAND.


Be off with you, now!


- Alex F. Vance

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Hear Alex, Krahnos, Vahn and Blue_Panther on Knotcast this week

Folks,


Krahnos, Vahn, Blue_Panther and I got together with Fuzzwolf from Knotcast
over Skype to record an open-heart roundtable about the production of
Heathen City #2. Artistic insights, puerile joking, and some serious
philosophizing ensued for an hour and a half. Check it out here:


http://www.foxstuffers.com/News_files/f2135dc95d43ba0c33e8a2b9cfd2b7e2-84.html


Regrettably, Charha, ZooshWolf and Fel couldn't join us. If this episode
turns out to be popular enough, who knows - we might do a followup in a few
months that brings the whole gang together.


Do let us know what y'all thought, yeah?


- Alex F. Vance


Monday, June 15, 2009

I am a social-networking SEX GOD.

Some of you may have noticed I've gone on a rather vicious social networking safari as part of my long-term plan to penetrate your tinfoil hats and control your minds. It has been brought to my attention that my guerrilla tactics are unbecoming a gentlemen.


So fine, have at me, you scoundrels. Stalk me back. See how I like it.


Pry into my every private moment, scan my every intimate thought and hold it against me. It's only fair.


General
Facebook:   http://www.facebook.com/alexfvance
Twitter:    http://www.twitter.com/alexfvance (on Twitter every character counts, but I deserve an underscore, dammit!
LiveJournal:   http://alexfvance.livejournal.com (no shit!)
MySpace:   http://www.myspace.com/alexfuckingvance (I wonder how long until I get banned for that username)
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexvance (total pro)


Furry
VCL:    http://us.vclart.net/vcl/Artists/Osfer (I forgot I had this)
FurAffinity: http://www.furaffinity.net/user/osfer
Yiffstar:    http://www.yiffstar.com/index.php?action=authorsearch&authorsearch=alexfvance
MyFursona:    http://www.myfursona.com/user/Osfer (does anyone use this?)
Furry4Life:    http://furry4life.ning.com/profile/AlexVance


Heathen City
Facebook fan page for HC:    http://www.facebook.com/thealexvance#/pages/Heathen-city/61315365158
TVTropes entry for HC:    http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main.HeathenCity
HC on Wikipedia:    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heathen_City


Privacy is for pansies!


Peace.

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Announcing Heathen City Vol. 2: Paved with Bad Intentions



It's time. By Gosh, by Golly, it's finally time. A year in the making. A gaggle of artistic titans. ZooshWolf, Krahnos, Vahnfox, Blue_Panther illustrate four scintillating stories, with Fel and Charha's impeccable skills rounding out the art team. And a gorgeous cover by Kaji.

The hotly-anticipated second volume of the Ursa Major Award-winning graphic novel is coming this summer. Anthrocon. July 2. Available for pre-order NOW.


Forget about what happens after Malloy so casually juggled grenades on the good ship Corinthia. The question you should be asking is: what happened before?


Four stories, illustrated by an international team of superb artists, expose at the roots of the Maranatha mystery by exploring pivotal moments in the lives of the people involved.

Owen's first foray into the world's oldest profession, Tony Caulfield's formative years, Malloy's escapades mere hours before that fateful phone-call - and a stranger whose part in all this has yet to be discovered.

These stories push the boundaries on all sides, with romance and comedy stacked against terror and madness, tracing the perilous course between heroism and naivetĂ©, innocence and villainy, and all the while there glimmers the dread of something wicked slouching toward the horizon... 

But there's always time for a bit of fun on the side. After all, you only live once.

Coming July 2. Get it at Anthrocon or pre-order and save $5 - buy #1 and #2 together and save $10!

- Alex Vance

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

On the issue of marriage.

Since it's likely that any posts in the near future will revolve around Heathen City and promotion thereof in anticipation of the (hopefully) very near-future release, here's something unrelated, that I've been wanting to put down for a while, and recently found an opportunity to when a friend contacted me for my perspectives on marriage for an advanced class she was scheduled to teach. Also, I love run-on sentences and WILL NOT APOLOGIZE

The separation of church and state, in my view, is a good thing, but in many civilizations religion was the first true civil order, offering synchronization among citizens and social services far beyond the scope of whatever ruling body officially held power.
Hospitals, orphanages, and other essential civil services were provided first by the church and later adopted by the state, as governing bodies became equipped to (and interested in) expanding their portfolio of services to their entire citizenry. The same applies for legal functions previously executed by the church, such as inheritance, birthright and in some cases adoption.
Governments have adopted these legal functions from the church in the same way that photography adopted portraiture from the art of painting, leaving behind the true core of any religion: exploring and acting upon each person's individual relationship with the Above. (To complete the painting metaphor, the removal of portraiture as a significant practice in painting left the pictorial arts with their true core: personal expression of the artist, exploring the personal experience of reality rather than merely producing a facsimile).

Marriage is one of these functions too, and in my view, it belongs with the state. The legally and justly elected establishment of a nation, constructed to represent the thoughts and priorities of its citizens, should be the arbiter of the definition of marriage.
The highest obligation of the law is to be fair, the most significant portion of which is to be consistent. The practice of legal precedent is the best example: a decision, once made, informs all future decisions on an identical decision. <!--more-->

In the issue of gay marriage, if gays are considered equals to straights and their relationships likewise, then 'marriage' is one of their rights -- as it is a civil institution governed by the law of the state.

However, for many people, the Church remains an important factor in their lives and to them, the institutions' ecclesiastic origins mean more than their current state-run incarnations. I am actually not at all offended when a Christian tells me they support legally-equal civil unions among gays, but that, to them, marriage is a sacrament under Christ, and that they don't like that word to be used.
I disagree with them, of course, but I can't at all fault them for their desire, and find it wholly reasonable in the context of their faith.

But as I am unaffiliated with any formal religion, while I'm on this Earth I am a citizen of my nation first. If there is to be a special term for a marriage under Christ that's separate from a marriage under the Law, I have no problem with that at all -- but it cannot be 'marriage'. That belongs to the state, which is to say, to every citizen of the nation. The practice predates Judeo-Christian religion, and the modern incarnation of the Church has no more claim over it than the extinct faiths of pre-Roman Europeans.

They are of course more than welcome to invent a new word for their view of marriage - and I actually don't mean that as any form of mockery. Though I do of course invite whimsical suggestions as to which word would be appropriate :)